
Landslides Kill and Hurt Thousands, but Science Largely Ignores These Disasters
Compared with landslides, volcanoes and hurricanes get a lot more attention, as well as research funding

Naomi Oreskes is a professor of the history of science at Harvard University. She is author of Why Trust Science? (Princeton University Press, 2019) and co-author of The Big Myth (Bloomsbury, 2023). Credit: Nick Higgins

Compared with landslides, volcanoes and hurricanes get a lot more attention, as well as research funding

“Realists” argue that climate plans need to accommodate oil and gas, but that only perpetuates the climate crisis

The mountaineer Hilaree Nelson inspired people to care about the climate crisis

In an ominous sign of global warming, melting permafrost underneath Arctic lakes lets them drain into the ground

Concerns about accusations of hype may have biased them toward conservative underestimates

Stanford University’s Doerr School of Sustainability will take energy industry donations, which will warp priorities and research agendas

Researchers worry about being branded as partisan, but people want to hear from experts

Instead of scaling up renewable energy, researchers promote unproved ideas

Greenhouse gas emissions from research damage climate

Doctors may accept spurious claims about medical treatments, and invalid studies wrongly influence public policy

Academics too often use intellectual attainment to excuse abusive behavior. That needs to stop

Data show alarming declines in wildlife but also point to ways to save it

People should be skeptical of big claims based on only one study and dig a little deeper

These plants take too long to build and bring online, and we don’t have that much time

Our climate problem is big, but a person’s diet change can make an impact

Women are investigating critical climate crisis problems such as the stability of giant ice sheets

Two physicists object to a Scientific American essay calling for an end to one climate report. A science historian counters that the report has done its job

It’s time to redirect your major focus to how we deal with the problem

Jargon is appropriate when you’re speaking with colleagues, but it’s a turnoff for the rest of us

Unfortunately, its strongest proponent was, which tainted its reception
Support science journalism.

Thanks for reading Scientific American. Knowledge awaits.
Already a subscriber? Sign in.
Thanks for reading Scientific American. Create your free account or Sign in to continue.
Create Account